Бизнес••NEXORA Editorial•nbd.com.cn
Li Xiang: In-house development does not mean replacing battery suppliers
Summary
Li Xiang has commented on the debate over efforts to “de-China” the automotive industry. He said that developing in-house technologies does not necessarily mean replacing external suppliers, while automakers’ battery strategies cannot be reduced to a simple choice between buying batteries and making them themselves.
Details
Li Xiang has commented on the debate surrounding efforts to “de-China” the automotive industry and the role of automakers in battery development. The central point of his position is that in-house development is not equivalent to completely replacing suppliers.
According to the information provided, automakers can build their own capabilities and technologies without necessarily abandoning cooperation with external partners. The issue therefore cannot be reduced to a choice between internal development and the use of suppliers.
Li Xiang also said that automakers’ battery strategies are not limited to two options: purchasing ready-made solutions or producing them entirely in-house. His comments point to a broader approach to the way battery development and supply are organized.
His remarks come amid a public debate over the phrase “de-China,” although the information provided does not identify specific companies or products, nor does it give further details about any actions taken. The significance of the statement lies in distinguishing in-house development from the complete exclusion of external suppliers.
NEXORA AI — Why it matters
The comments frame automakers’ battery strategies as more complex than a simple choice between buying from suppliers and producing batteries independently.
NEXORA PRO
Unlock detailed analysis, key facts, context, story developments, source comparisons, a personalized feed and smart alerts.
Explore NEXORA PRO